Dr. John Miklos & Dr. Robert Moore
Atlanta Center for Laparoscopic Urogynecology

* Atlanta Center for Laparoscopic Urogynecology promoting the highest standards for gynecology surgical care for women.     * Atlanta Center for Laparoscopic Urogynecology promoting the highest standards for gynecology surgical care for women*

Anterior Repair
Posterior Repair
LAVH
Paravaginal Repair
  (Cystocele)

Burch
TVT Sling
Transobturator (TOT) Sling
Mini-Sling *New*
Sacral Colpopexy
Colpocleisis
Interstim
Enterocele Repair
Vesicovaginal Fistula
Uterosacral Ligament
Sacrospinous Ligament
Adhesiolysis
Vault Suspension
Supracervical
  Hysterectomy

Perigee Vaginal Mesh
Apogee Vaginal Mesh
Perineoplasty
Laser Vaginal Rejuvenation
Labial Reduction
Hymen Restoration
Articles
Video Gallery
Payment Options
Research Trials
New Patient Forms
Site Map

Atlanta Center for Laparoscopic Urogynecology
Dr. John R. Miklos
M.D.,F.A.C.O.G.,F.A.C.S.,F.I.C.S.

Dr. Robert D. Moore
D.O.,F.A.C.O.G.,F.I.C.S.

3400C Old Milton Parkway
Alpharetta (Atlanta)
GA 30005

Phone 770-475-4499
Fax 770-475-0875

www.tvtsling.com
www.anewvagina.com
www.mmedicalspa.com
Atlanta Center for Laparoscopic Urogynecology
Laparoscopy Procedure
Home
NEW PATIENT FORMS
Incontinence
Incontinence Treatment
Prolapse
Laparoscopic
Laparoscopic Procedure
Ambulatory Procedure
TVT Sling
What's New
Testimonials
Meet the Physicians
Dr. Miklos
Dr. Moore
Dr. Mitchell
Contact Us
Links
Search Our Site

Laparoscopy >>

Laparoscopic And Minimally Invasive Procedures continued

Laparoscopic Burch Urethropexy

Laparoscopic Burchl RepairSince the introduction of the urethral suspension procedure in 1910, over 100 different surgical techniques for the treatment of genuine stress urinary incontinence have been described. Recently the American Urology Association has confirmed the two curative and enduring operations are the Laparoscopic Burch urethropexy and the pubovaginal sling. Dr. John Burch introduced the Burch colposuspension in 1961, which remains an outstanding operation for the treatment of activity related urinary incontinence. By emphasizing the principles of minimally invasive surgery, we have successfully adopted the laparoscopic Burch procedure. Drs. Miklos and Moore perform the Laparoscopic Burch procedure with no modifications of the open procedure with the only exception is the laparoscopic incisions instead of a large open incision.

Indications

Once the patient has been diagnosed with stress urinary incontinence (urine leakage due to coughing, sneezing, or increased abdominal pressure) after urodynamic testing, surgical options, such as Burch laparoscopy, are discussed with the patient. Once diagnosed with stress urinary incontinence, the patient is usually a candidate for either a sling or laparoscopic Burch procedure. The urodynamic study, along with the physical examination, determines which operation the patient should receive. If a patient has a cystocele due to paravaginal defects and has stress urinary incontinence, Drs. Miklos and Moore are more likely to recommend Burch laparoscopy over the sling, because laparoscopic access during the Burch procedure allows for reconstruction of the bladder support system (see paravaginal repair).

Advantages

We combine the advantages of laparoscopy with the proven, conventional Burch urethropexy. Patients that undergo the Laparoscopic Burch do not have to endure post operative pain and discomfort that is associated with the abdominal incision. In addition, our patients spontaneously void sooner in comparison to the conventional Burch. We believe this is due to less tissue disruption with the laparoscopic approach.

Laparoscopic Burch Advantages

Miniature Abdominal Incisions (< 1.2 cm)
Decreased Post Operative Pain and Recovery
Decreased Postoperative Voiding Dysfunction
Reduced Blood Loss
Shortened Hospitalization
90% Cure Rate of 5-10 Years After the Operation
Access To Advanced Pelvic Reconstruction Procedures
Less Chance of Ureter and Bladder Injury

Technique

Dr. Miklos published a review article in the Contemporary OBGYN describing his approach in great detail.

Review of the Surgical Literature - Laparoscopic Burch

Review of Laparoscopic Burch
Laparoscopic Burch: Figure 1

Most recent published literature describes the Burch urethropexy utilizing:

Four permanent sutures
Two sutures are placed at the level of the midurethra
Two sutures are placed at the level of the bladder neck
All sutures are passed through the Coopers ligament
Higher cure rates utilizing four sutures instead of two sutures







Burch Urethroplexy - Supporting the vagina (pubocervical fascia) beside the urethra is one of the two best cures for stress or activity related urine leakage.

Laparoscopic Burch
Laparoscopic Burch: Figure 2

Results

Drs. Miklos and Moore have experienced a long-term cure rate of 90% with the laparoscopic Burch procedure. These results are similar to a study in Obstetrics and Gynecology revealing an equal cure rate for laparoscopic vs. laparotomy over 2 years. With these results, we believe the laparoscopic Burch is a superior procedure over the conventional Burch, especially since results are similar without the disadvantage associated with a large incision.

Many patients feel that they must live with incontinence once they have had a failed incontinence procedure. We demonstrate a 90% cure rate in patients undergoing a laparoscopic Burch in those patients who have undergone previous procedures for incontinence. Drs. Moore and Miklos's results were published in the Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. Conventional wisdom states that repeat incontinence surgery should have a lower chance of success than a patient receiving surgery for the first time. Drs. Moore and Miklos' article shows even higher cure rates for repeat procedure with Burch laparoscopy than most physicians have published for primary procedures.

Complications

Because of Drs. Miklos and Moore 's vast experience in the laparoscopic Burch and/or paravaginal repair, their complication rate is lower than most physicians. A study by Drs. Harris and Cundiff from Duke University Medical Center revealed a 3.3% bladder and 6.7% ureter complication rate during the abdominal Burch procedure compared to our laparoscopic Burch complication rate of 2.3% bladder and 0% ureter.

Complication Rates
Laparoscopic Burch: Figure 3

Dr. Miklos published his complication rate in a series of 171 patients in the Journal of Urology. Of the 171 patients, 4 (2.3%) had injury to the lower urinary tract during laparoscopic Burch urethropexy and/or paravaginal repair. All 4 injuries were cystotomies (unavoidable entry into the bladder) in which 2 were in patients with previous abdominal retropubic urethropexies. Previous surgery in this area dramatically increases scar tissue making dissection difficult thus increasing the incidence of bladder injury. No ureteral ligation or placement of suture into the bladder was diagnosed. Other surgical parameters for our laparoscopic Burch urethropexy and paravaginal repair include an estimated blood loss of 50 mL, average hospital stay of less than 23 hours, and an average operative time of 50 minutes. All patients had their surgery completed via laparoscopy.

The literature review and our personal experience suggest that the laparoscopic Burch urethropexy and paravaginal repair procedure is safer and has fewer complications than the traditional open laparotomy for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence and cystourethrocele resulting from lateral vaginal wall defects.

Drs. Buller and Cundiff at The Johns Hopkins University Medical Center wrote a comprehensive review on laparoscopic surgeries for urinary incontinence. These physicians state, "The majority of the data for laparoscopic surgeries for the treatment of urinary incontinence suggest that the success rates are similar and complication rates are lower than those for the open procedure."Buller and Cundiff also discuss the doubt about long-term results. The conclusion was that long-term results are determined by the physician's experience and if the physician modifies the procedure. To date, Dr. Miklos and Moore have performed more than 700 laparoscopic Burch and/or paravaginal repairs with no modifications of the Burch procedure.

General Complications of Laparoscopic Burch

Bladder or Ureter Injury
Voiding Dysfunction
Hemorrhage
Incomplete Bladder Emptying
Urinary Retention

Atlanta Urogynecology Associates Experience

Drs. Miklos and Moore have per anti incontinence surgery. Because of this vast experience with Burch laparoscopy, they are able to achieve high cure rates and low complications from the laparoscopic Burch procedure with a successful long-term outcome. By performing the Burch in the original manner in which it was designed, we have taken a proven open surgery and applied our advanced laparoscopic skills to allow for smaller incisions and a shorter recuperation time. Dr. Miklos and Moore have performed just as many, if not more, laparoscopic Burch and or paravaginal repairs than most surgeons in the country. Their published series of 171 patients as noted above constitutes the largest known published series in the English literature. These 171 patients account for less than 2.5 years of their total surgical series. They also have the largest series in the English literature of complicated laparoscopic Burch procedures which are performed in patients that have had previous surgeries. Today's surgeons rarely achieve these results.


:: Laparoscopic Procedure ::

Home | Incontinence | Incontinence Treatment | Prolapse | Prolapse Treatment | Laparoscopy | TVT Sling | What's New
Ambulatory Procedure | Testimonials | Dr. Miklos :: Dr. Moore :: Dr. Mitchell | Articles | Search Our Site | Anterior Repair
Posterior Repair | Site Map | Burch | LAVH | Paravaginal Repair | Interstim | Transobturator (TOT) Sling | Mini-Sling | Sacral Colpopexy
Posterior IVS | Colpocleisis | Enterocele Repair | Vesicovaginal Fistula | Uterosacral Ligament | Sacrospinous Ligament
Video Gallery | Adhesiolysis | Vault Suspension | Supracervical | Hysterectomy | Labial Reduction | Research Trials
Perineoplasty | Laser Vaginal Rejuvenation (LVR) | Hymen Restoration | Contact Us

Copyright © 2000-2007 Atlanta Urogynecology Associates (www.miklosandmoore.com)
All text and images on this web site are property of Dr. John R. Miklos and may not be reproduced in any way without permission.
Website Development & Search Engine Optimization by GhostNet, Inc.